'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Monday, November 18, 2013

Spinoza: Origin and Nature of Emotions: Definitions


adequate / inadequate cause


adequate: whose effect can be clearly and distinctly be perceived through it

inadequate: whose effect cannot be perceived through it

‘perception’ for Spinoza – is what is given to the mind –

as distinct from the action of the mind

that which is given to the mind – independent of interpretation – is undefined –

is unknown

any interpretation is open to question – open to doubt – is uncertain –

whether ‘clear and distinct’ – or not

an inadequate cause –

as that which is not given

that is to say – unknown

any so called cause of an effect –

is an hypothesis


active / passive


active:

when something takes place within us or outside of us –

whose adequate cause we are –

when from our nature follows in us or outside us which can be clearly and distinctly understood through that alone

any such ‘understanding’ –

is open to question – open to doubt –

is uncertain


passive:

we suffer or are passive –

when something takes place in us or follows from our nature of which we are the partial cause

any ‘cause’ – partial or not –

is an hypothesis –

open to question open to doubt –

uncertain

suffering then is the interpretation

that we are the partial cause

this is hardly an adequate account of suffering

the reality is –

we can and will suffer –

however we interpret the world


emotion


modifications of the body by which the power or action in the body is increased or diminished

and at the same time the ideas of these modifications

if we can be the adequate cause of these modifications –

then the emotion is action –

otherwise a passion

we can make this interpretation – active / passive – action / emotion (effect)

Spinoza here puts this as an interpretative model –

and it may indeed be a useful model –

yes – we may imagine we are the ‘adequate cause’ of our actions –

or that we are not

whatever the case –

we are always in the realm of interpretation –

my own view is –

an action is a reaching out to the word in whatever way

an emotion is a sense of oneself in relation to the world

there is no action without emotion

a passionate response to the world –

is an intense engagement of the self with the world –

passion is active


© greg t. charlton. 2013.